The problem with Black History Month — or maybe there isn’t a problem?

Is Black History Month good or bad? It’s kind of both.

Growing up and attending elementary school, we were always taught about the importance of Black History Month. And I was all for it. We learned about Harriet Tubman, Crispus Attucks, MLK and all the important black people in American history. It was cool, I learned a lot and it was good.

But as the years went on in my life and now I am in my 20s, I start to rethink Black History Month. Is it important anymore? Do we still need it?

This is a tough subject because there are two arguments for it and I am on the fence because I agree with both.

First, let me show you what sparked my desire to write this entry. Check this out.

The basis of this argument comes from two points of view. Why do we still have it? Have we moved on from race consciousness that we don’t need it?

For the longest time, I had accepted that Black History Month existed because of partial guilt to slavery but also as a an attempt to help mend the wounds that racism has done to the country. And I was OK with it. The fact that we as a country were accepting and recognizing black people was fine with me.

But as any non-black person, I wondered where my month was too. When is Chinese History Month? Are my people not important enough to get a month? (Asian Heritage Month is May, but does anyone actually talk about it like it exists?)

Then that struck me. Is this month harmful for our attempt to recognize equality? I’ve always believed that in order to appreciate equality, we can’t single out people. Everyone should be treated equally, no special treatment or recognition. The fact that we have a specific month dedicated to certain people isn’t really equality is it? Unless everyone gets their share, it’s really going the opposite direction of racial equality.

Of course, that’s impossible to dedicate a month to every race because there aren’t enough. People will be left out because of these special months. Wouldn’t it be easier to not have any special months and to treat people equally?

But of course, there is the other argument which I also am on board with. Black History Month is good because it makes us appreciate the uniqueness of every single person. Not only just for blacks, but it gives us an idea that every person is unique and we can’t generalize people.

There is so much knowledge and love that comes from this month. It gives people the starting point early in age to help recognize that people are individuals. Appreciating each other for what makes us different is what makes America so great.

So yes, I am all for anything that does that. And if Black History Month does that, then let’s keep it.

But what do we do now? Which is the best way to look at it?

Are we so far away from our racist ways that we don’t need that reminder every February? Or do we still need it because we haven’t changed much at all?

Maybe I’d see things differently if I was black. But I am not and I don’t know how other black people truly feel about it. I might see it different if Chinese History Month existed. I only wonder what could be and what should be.

Black History Month doesn’t need to exist. But it has every reason to stick around. I’m on the fence here. There’s a good argument for both sides.


1 Comment

Filed under Holiday, Observation

One response to “The problem with Black History Month — or maybe there isn’t a problem?

  1. Eric

    The disparate amount of attention and celebration of these ethnic months is fairly racist. The agitprop blacks (not all blacks) are as racist as anyone gets and feel it is their right to be racist against all others and no one should but (according to them) is racist against them and all negative things that happen to them and any black person is because of racism. No one else (according to them) has ever experienced significant racism (certainly not getting beaten up everyday because of being Asian doesn’t count), being called ethnic slurs in childhood & adulthood while serving in the military and in civilian law enforcement certainly doesn’t count either), getting my car shot at during the Rodney King riots certain wasn’t racist either while having to drive past Nickerson Gardens in my personal vehicle just because its 100% black and I’m not black and not burning the businesses down in their neighborhoods that were marked “black-owned” and burning and/or looting all the other ones wasn’t racist.

    Let’s see a major TV station have a show where an actor who happens to be identifiably Asian in appearance have a major role that isn’t a stereotypical one and have the show actually last more than one season, rather than be cancelled because “the rest of America couldn’t relate” to an Asian person as being “American.” Ever get the “what nationality are you?” My answer: “I’m American.” Them: “No, you can’t be! You’re part something else…are you Chinese?” Me: “You’re confusing ethnicity with nationality. I’m half Chinese and half Caucasion. I’m 100% American. You’re thinking that only being white = being American. You’re black, yet I’m sure you don’t think you’re not American, even if you’re part white.” Them: “No, you’re right. I never thought about it like that.” Me: “I guess that makes you a racist.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s